BloodMoonBetrayedCover
SheWolf Cover
Dark Succession
Spam

One woman’s trash is another woman’s treasure.

Ok, so you’ve probably heard the phrase, One man’s trash is another man’s treasure. I’m here to tell you that also works in reverse.

When I was a kid living in Germany, they had what they called “junk day”, where you could sit out anything in your house that you didn’t want anymore, usually furniture or electronics, and then neighbors and others would wander the streets and chose what they wanted from that “junk”. My mom acquired a sewing machine, a daybed, and many other nice little gadgets that their original families thought weren’t exciting or important any longer. They were “junk”. The daybed stayed in our home for a few years until we moved back to the states. I’m not sure what happened to the sewing machine, but alot of that stuff still floated around the house for many years.

I often wish we had Junk Days here, so I could put some of the junk in my garage out without having to throw it away – because it’s good, I just don’t have time to sit out and run a garage sale. And even if I did, what would it be worth?

Often I find it offensive when people say romance is “Trashy”. Really? I don’t think so. But you know what,I do sometimes think other books are “trash” for me. For instance, I completely despise tragedies. Why? Because to me, they don’t celebrate life. They don’t celebrate love. Their only moral tends to be “Love hurts, watch them die!”, So you know what that means, right? It means I dislike 90% of all “Classics”. Romeo and Juliet? Now that just didn’t do it for me. I remember when I read it, I had no idea it was a tragedy (Ok, I was a kid and clueless). I hated it. Couldn’t stand the way they tried everything to be together and then died. Sure, it was an original for it’s time, and it had some great writing, but it’s not something I would read without it being required to graduate a course.

But then, I do enjoy thrillers and romances, yet people consider romances to be “trash”. Really? The writing is as good or better than alot of other books out there. So does happily ever after equal trash? There’s people who say it’s because it has sex in it. But wait, some of the best books out there that are NOT romance, have sex in them. So what makes romance “Trash” when the others with the same “elements” are not? Since when is celebrating life and love considered trash? It’s not. Like I said, one woman’s treasure is another woman’s trash. Or is that one woman’s trash is another woman’s treasure? Yep. I think that’s more it. Because what others say is trash is nothing more than a treasure celebrating love and life! If that’s trash, give me more. Let me dirty up my home with this ugly celebration of life. :) Wait……. Celebration of life and love. Now there’s a gem I’ll save if not in paper, in my heart, forever.

Post to Twitter

2 Responses to “One woman’s trash is another woman’s treasure.”

  • Beth Caudill says:

    I love the tragedies. Guess that why’s I’m branching into erotic horror (or anti-romance as I think of them.)

    Not ever story has a happy ending. And while I still love fairy tales and I also love books that aren’t wrapped up with a bow. Although I preferred Hamlet and King Lear to R&J.

    :)

  • Teresa D'Amario
    Twitter:
    says:

    Beth, I certainly understand that. :) I just wish though, that people wouldn’t consider you “Not well read” if you don’t like the “anti-romances” I like that name for them though, because that’s technically what they were/are. I don’t read ONLY romance, and am actually rather widely read, but I don’t PREFER books that are so adamant of saying that life is over and a waste of time, just like I don’t think that everyone should love romance. It’s a matter of preference and think it should be honored as such.

Tigress By the Tail
Leopards Key
Random Trailers